about

Considering response options

I’m thinking about how to respond. I could ask if the user wants me to pull a source and summarize it. It seems okay to summarize without sources, but I definitely should avoid making up quotes.

![yIca](/assets/images/7D814438.jpg)

I could propose options in Chinese, like asking if they want a summary, verification, or translation. It’s important to craft my response concisely. This way, I can offer precisely what the user needs!

你是想看这条新闻的要点速览,还是要我去查证原报道并附上出处再做详细梳理?

可选:

  1. 要点速览:我基于公开报道给你3-5条核心结论,适合快速了解。
  2. 查证+详解:我检索来源,核对细节(Enzo致电内容、向谁道歉、歌曲具体争议点、俱乐部/国家队回应),再做完整摘要。
  3. ![Cons](/assets/images/6EDCFE3F.jpg)
  4. 改写/标题:我把这条换成更标准的新闻导语或多种标题版本。

if